Posted by Admin in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2010
on Sep 11th, 2010 | Comments Off
Susanne E. Cannon and Rebel A. Cole
Online First™, 8 September 2010
Abstract
In this study, we present panel-data evidence on REIT liquidity and its determinants over the 1988–2007 period. We focus upon liquidity measures that do not require micro-structure data (1) to facilitate use of our results as benchmarks for comparisons with results from international markets for which micro-structure data may be unavailable, (2) to provide benchmarks that do not require access to costly (and voluminous) micro-structure data. We find that REIT liquidity improved...
Posted by Admin in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2010
on Sep 11th, 2010 | Comments Off
Jian Yang, Yinggang Zhou and Wai Kin Leung
Online First™, 8 September 2010
Abstract
We apply a multivariate asymmetric generalized dynamic conditional correlation GARCH model to daily index returns of S&P500, US corporate bonds, and their real estate counterparts (REITs and CMBS) from 1999 to 2008. We document, for the first time, evidence for asymmetric volatilities and correlations in CMBS and REITs. Due to their high levels of leverage, REIT returns exhibit stronger asymmetric volatilities. Also, both REIT and stock returns show strong evidence of...
Posted by Admin in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2010
on Sep 11th, 2010 | Comments Off
Kimberly R. Goodwin, Ken H. Johnson and Leonard V. Zumpano
Online First™, 24 August 2010
Abstract
In the past few years, many states have responded to the increasing number of limited service brokers by passing minimum service requirements. Limited service brokers can be viewed as those brokers who are offering their marketing and representative services A La Carte as opposed to the more traditional full-services brokers offering of a Table D’hôte (one size fits all) for their services. Supporters claim the legislation is necessary to protect consumers who...
Posted by Admin in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2010
on Sep 11th, 2010 | Comments Off
James S. Doran, David R. Peterson and S. McKay Price
Online First™, 17 August 2010
Abstract
Using computer based content analysis, we quantify the linguistic tone of quarterly earnings conference calls for publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). After controlling for the earnings announcement, we examine the relation between conference call tone and the contemporaneous stock price reaction. We find that the tone of the conference call dialogue has significant explanatory power for the abnormal returns at and immediately following quarterly...
Posted by Admin in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2010
on Sep 11th, 2010 | Comments Off
Stephen J. Dempsey, David M. Harrison, Kimberly F. Luchtenberg and Michael J. Seiler
Online First™, 3 August 2010
Abstract
We examine the capital market pricing implications of firm disclosure opacity as measured by the linguistic readability of REIT annual reports. The SEC has expressed concern that firms selectively manage the transparency of disclosures in order to hide adverse information. After controlling for other non-experimental factors that influence the readability of REIT financial statements, we find (1) financial opacity is negatively related...
Posted by Admin in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2010
on Sep 11th, 2010 | Comments Off
Ming-Chi Chen, Chi-Lu Peng, So-De Shyu and Jhih-Hong Zeng
Online First™, 3 August 2010
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of changes in monetary policy on US equity real estate investment trust (EREIT) returns in lower and higher return ranges during bull, bear, and volatile stock market states using quantile regression. Results show that EREIT returns are sensitive to changes in monetary policy at different EREIT return ranges in different market states. During bull markets, changes in monetary policy have a significant negative impact on EREIT when...
Posted by Admin in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2010
on Sep 11th, 2010 | Comments Off
Geoffrey K. Turnbull
Online First™, 3 August 2010
Abstract
Many private common carriers or regulated utilities have eminent domain powers in the U.S. The rationale resembles that for local governments; lower cost of assembling land for long distance electric transmission, gas and oil products pipelines, etc. Recent court cases raise questions about whether eminent domain allows firms to use inefficiently long indirect land corridors, inefficiently wide corridors, or higher value land when lower value land is available as an alternative? Despite ...